воскресенье, 9 января 2011 г.

Gulf Oil Spill Surprise: Methane Almost Gone

After months of speculation about what will happen to theGulf oil spill, it turns out Mother Nature has rolled up her sleeves and dispatched with a lot of the gas released along with it—in just four months.

Surprisingly, practically all of the methane that accompanied nearly five million barrels of oil leaked into the northernGulf of Mexico (map)has been devoured by giant bacterial blooms, a new study says. Methane, the main component of natural gas, is typically found with oil.

(Read more about hownature is fighting back against the oil spill.)

TheDeepwater Horizonoil rig burned and sank last April, and the damaged wellhead on the seafloor below was permanently capped in July.

"We thought it would probably be something on the order of a year or so until the methane disappeared,"said study leaderDavid Valentine, a microbial geochemist at the University of California, Santa Barbara."Instead we found that by mid-September it was completely gone."

Deep, water-dissolved methane was the single most abundant hydrocarbon released during the spill, making up about 20 percent of the flow from the wellhead, Valentine and his team estimated.

However, the discovery doesn't mean that the oil itself is gone. The team found oil nearly everywhere in the deep water—suggesting that oil-water mixing was widespread, and that some ingredients of the oil haven't completely degraded.

(See"Why the Gulf Oil Spill Isn't Going Away.")

Ocean vs. Oil

The Gulf spill's methane release may rival the amount of methane regularly released via deep-ocean hydrothermal vents, oil seeps, and the breakdown of methane-rich gas hydrates in ocean sediments.

(Read more aboutthe Gulf of Mexico's natural seeps.)

Scientists are keeping a close eye on all of Earth's methane sources. That's because warming ocean temperatures are thought to make some parts of the ocean's geology less stable. This could trigger the release of huge amounts of the gas into the ocean and potentially the atmosphere, where it may contribute toglobal warming.

"The global ocean seafloor contains the largest reservoir of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and there is evidence that releases of methane from this reservoir have modulated climate in the history of the planet,"said study co-authorJohn Kessler, a chemical oceanographer at Texas A&M University.

"Without these bacteria, methane could be released to the atmosphere—and if the release is large enough, it could influence global temperatures."

(Related:"Methane-Munching Microbes Take a Bite Out of Warming.")

But the oil spill—essentially an unprecedented and accidental experiment—offers a piece of good news: The bacterial rapid-response system might be able to significantly curb the effects of even massive natural methane emissions.

"What we found is that for a deep-ocean methane release, the ocean has a capacity to deal with that in pretty rapid order,"study leader Valentine said.

Low-Profile Bacterial Bloom

The team studied bacteria concentrations in deep, oil-fouled Gulf of Mexico waters during the spill event and again after the wellhead was sealed.

They found a larger-than-expected presence of methane-eating bacteria, as well as low oxygen levels. Lower oxygen suggests microbial activity because the organisms breathe the gas while they devour methane.

Methane-eating bacteria—discovered only about a decade ago—are distinct from their oil-degrading relatives, which themselves went to work on other oil ingredients.

The newly discovered bacterial bloom isn't as visibly obvious as the vibrantly colored algal blooms often seen in shallower waters, Valentine noted.

"I suspect you wouldn't notice much to look at it, but there was a big change in what happened to the biological community,"according to Valentine, whose study was published online January 6 in the journalScience Express.

Bacteria No Guarantee Against Oil

Antje Boetius, a microbiologist at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen, Germany, was impressed with the study.

"We have worked at huge natural methane seeps before, and never found a situation like this with a huge propagation of bacteria in which the methane goes away so quickly—something special {such as warm temperatures} in that event really induced the bacteria to grow tremendously,"she said.

But Boetius stresses, as do the study's authors, that caution is needed before assuming these findings can be applied in other places where oil spills may occur.

(See"Exxon Valdez Anniversary: 20 Years Later, Oil Remains.")

"What we've learned from oil spills in general is that the speed with which nature heals itself is very different for different accidents for a number of reasons, including water temperatures,"she said.

For example,"bacteria are slowed in colder waters, and the Gulf is a rather warm place compared to locations like the polar regions—which are exactly where we'd expect global warming to have the largest impacts on huge amounts of buried methane.

"Can we deduce from these data where we have an unexpected explosion of bacteria that the same could happen in other very sensitive areas which are much colder? That’s the big question."

Gulf Bacteria Primed For Next Spill?

Now that the spill's methane is mostly cleaned up, the fate of methane-munching bacteria is another intriguing question the team will be watching closely.

"We expect that the {high amount of bacteria} will gradually dissipate, but we don’t really know how the population relaxes back to a baseline level,"Valentine said.

Indeed he believes the baseline may be forever changed—and Gulf bacteria could become even more efficient in dealing with future oil spills.

(Also see"3 Future Oil-Spill Fighters: Sponges, Superbugs, and Herders.")

"Sometimes where there is petroleum contamination and a bacterial response, the environment harbors a memory of it. ... It maintains a kind of priming, so that if you contaminate it again, it will react more quickly than it would in a pristine environment."

forNational Geographic News


Source

суббота, 8 января 2011 г.

Fish as Good as College Students in Numbers Test

Are you as smart as a mosquitofish?

According to a new study, college students showed roughly the same numerical skills as the smallfishwhen presented with a laboratory test.

Mosquitofish, freshwater fish with a taste for mosquito larvae, are highly social. When a mosquitofish finds itself alone, its top priority becomes finding others. A previous study showed that thefish can, in fact,"count"—differentiating between numerical quantities in a lab experiment.

(Related:"Monkeys Can Subtract, Study Finds.")

The new study shows that the fish can not only tell the difference between small numbers such as 4 and 8, but they can also differentiate between quantities as large as 100 and 200.

"You just don't expect interesting results like this when dealing with animals like fish,"said study leaderChristian Agrilloof the University of Padova in Italy."We thought this was really incredible."

But numerical skills break down for the fish when the ratios between two numbers change—an effect that was also seen among human volunteers.

Fish That Can"Count"to a Hundred

For the initial experiment, lone fish were trained in the lab to associate a door bearing a certain number of geometric shapes with the path to rejoining a larger group.

The fish were then placed in tanks where they had to chose between one of two identical doors bearing different numbers of symbols. For example, four shapes might be associated with door A and eight shapes with door B.

At the beginning of the test, the fish did not know where to go, and they chose randomly. Over time, however, the fish started to chose the correct door more often than by chance alone.

(Related:"Coot Birds Can Count, Study Says.")

The new study repeated this experiment—but then the researchers started using bigger numbers of shapes on the doors.

"It was kind of funny, most of them appeared to be surprised when we switched from small numbers to hundreds. They swam inside the tank for a while, looking at the new stimuli as if they were trying to understand what was going on,"Agrillo said.

"However, after a short while they started to solve the task as well."

Ratios Boggle Fish and Humans

As the researchers tinkered with the amounts on the doors, they found that when the sets of shapes were closer in number, the fish were less successful.

For example, when the ratio between the shapes on the two doors was 1:2 (8 versus 16) or 2:3 (8 versus 12), the fish chose the correct door more often than by chance. But when the ratio became 3:4 (9 versus 12), the fish showed no indication that they could detect a difference.

Keen to see how the numerical skills of fish compare to those of humans, the researchers asked a group of 25 undergraduate students to engage in a test that presented them with the same types of challenges.

The test forced the students to determine the difference between large numbers in two seconds, without stopping to deliberately count the shapes.

While humans were universally more accurate than fish, they showed the same degraded ability to judge number differences as ratios shifted from 2:3 to 3:4.

According to Agrillo and colleagues, the results add to evidence that humans, fish, and other vertebrates share the same abilities for processing numbers as a distant but common ancestor.

(Also see"Fossil Fish With 'Limbs' Is Missing Link, Study Says.")

The counting-fish study was published December 22 in the journalPLoS ONE.

forNational Geographic News


Source

пятница, 7 января 2011 г.

Pictures: Birds Fall From Sky in Arkansas

A dead bird lies on the ground in Beebe,Arkansas, on Sunday after being thrown off the roof of a home by a worker with United States Environmental Services LLC.

More than 3,000red-winged blackbirdsmysteriously tumbled dead from the Arkansas sky on New Year's Eve, theArkansas Game and Fish Commissiontold the Associated Press. (Visit National Geographic's backyard birding central.)

A preliminary report—released Monday by the Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Commission—suggests the birds died of trauma of unknown cause.

"The birds obviously hit something very hard and had hemorrhages,"game-and-fish commission bird expert Karen Rowe told CNN.

It's unknown whether the trauma occurred during contact with something in the sky—such aslightningor high-altitude hail—or when the birds hit the ground, Rowe said.

Commission scientists began to examine the carcasses today, and final results on the exact cause of the birds' death could be back within a week.


Source

четверг, 6 января 2011 г.

Pictures:"Bodies" Fill Underwater Sculpture Park

A snorkeler swims over life-size statues near Cancún,Mexico,in a late 2010 picture.

More than 400 of the permanent sculptures have been installed in recent months in the National Marine Park of Cancún, Isla Mujeres, and Punta Nizuc (map of the region) as part of a major artwork called"The Silent Evolution."The installation is the first endeavor of a new underwater museum called MUSA, orMuseo Subacuático de Arte.(Watcha video of the new sculpture garden.)

Created by Mexico-based British sculptorJason deCaires Taylor, the Caribbean installation is intended to eventually cover more than 4,520 square feet (420 square meters), which would make it"one of the largest and most ambitious underwater attractions in the world,"according to a museum statement.

(See"New Artificial Reefs 'Grow' From Mideast Peace Deal.")

In doing so, Taylor hopes the reefs, which are already stressed bymarine pollution,warming waters, andoverfishing, can catch a break from the approximately 750,000 tourists who visit local reefs each year.

"That puts a lot of pressure on the existing reefs," Taylor told National Geographic News."So part of this project is to actually discharge those people away from the natural reefs and bring them to an area of artificial reefs."

—With reporting by Fritz Faerber


Source

среда, 5 января 2011 г.

Bumblebees Taking a Nosedive in North America

Four bumblebee species once common across North America have suffered precipitous—and so far mysterious—declines, a new study shows.

Within the past 20 years abundances of the bee speciesBombus occidentalis, B. affinis, B. pensylvanicus,andB. terricolahave plummeted by up to 96 percent. (Related:"Mystery Bee Disappearances Sweeping U.S.")

The finding is based on a new analysis of more than 73,000 museum collections of bumblebees, which showed where bees had been found over the last century, as well as collections of wild bees across the United States. The study looked at 8 of the 50 known bumblebee species in North America. (Getbumblebee wallpaper.)

"We found that yes, indeed, {these four species} are seriously declining, but there are some other species doing very well,"said study co-authorSydney Cameronof the University of Illinois' department of entomology.

The discovery makes it harder to pinpoint pesticides orclimate changeas a cause for the bug die-off, because those factors wouldn't explain why other bumblebee species in the same areas have survived.

One possibility is that the four species in crisis may all be infected with the invasiveNosema bombifungus, which was found in greater quantities on the dying bumblebees than on relatively healthy species studied by Cameron's team.

And bees reared in Europe, where the fungus is more virulent, were imported to California in the early 1990s—right before the bees began to die off. (Related blog:"International Rescue Planned for Endangered English Bumblebee.")

But the link isn't certain yet.

"We're at this frustrating stage where there's a lot of circumstantial evidence to say that these species are declining because of this pathogen,"Cameron said."But we don't have direct evidence. We have no cause and effect."

Bumblebees Highly Efficient"Farmworkers"

Likehoneybees, bumblebees rely on pollen as a source of protein. In addition to their wild work, bumblebees are widely used as pollinators for multibillion-dollar commercial crops, such as blueberries and tomatoes. (Related:"Bees Like It Hot—Pollinators Prefer Warm Flowers, Study Reveals.")

Theoretically, a bee imported from Europe carryingNosema bombicould have escaped into the wild through a greenhouse vent and infected its wild brethren.

In fact, the bee die-off seen in the new study"look{s} very much like a pattern you'd find with a newly introduced disease,"saidRobbin Thorp, professor emeritus at the University of California, Davis. Thorp has been studying pollinators for decades and first noticed the decline of a fifth bumblebee species,B. franklini,in the late 1990s.

(Related:"Bee Viruses Spread via Flower Pollen.")

Although Thorp was not involved in the present study, he and Cameron will soon be working together to study more museum specimens"to see if we can pick up the fingerprint of theNosemaprior to and after this period of potential introduction,"he said.

The researchers also studied the DNA of the bee species and found that the declining species had less genetic diversity than the species doing well—a trait often seen in species whose populations are isolated, or fragmented, resulting in increased inbreeding.

"They seem to be doing a lot of moving around,"Cameron said of the bees."They're not fragmented. But at the same time they have lower genetic diversity, and we don't know why."

Figuring out the exact cause of the bumblebee declines may be crucial for farmers, as bumblebees are even more efficient pollinators than honeybees. That's because the larger bees' high-frequency buzzing is just right for opening a flower's pollen-holding pores.

"You could use honeybees. You could throw thousands of colonies at {tomato plants}. But bee for bee, they're nowhere near as efficient,"Cameron said."A lot of flowers depend on this large, bumbly bee."

The bumblebee declines are reported in this week's issue of the journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

forNational Geographic News


Source

вторник, 4 января 2011 г.

Partial Eclipse"Preview": What You'll See Tomorrow

The moon appears to take a bite out of the sun over Manila in thePhilippinesduring a partialsolar eclipsein January 2009. Tomorrow sky-watchers in parts of Europe and Africa will be treated to a similar sight during the first of four partial solar eclipses slated to happen in 2011.

Solar eclipses occur when Earth, the moon, and the sun are aligned so that—as seen from Earth—the moon appears to cover all or part of the sun's disk, and Earth is cast in shadow. Partial solar eclipses happen when Earth crosses only through the faint outer part of the moon's shadow, known as the penumbra.

On Tuesday the moon's silhouette will start to move across the sun at 6:40 a.m. UT, when the penumbra hitsAlgeria. The last traces of the moon's outer shadow will cross northwestChinaat 11 a.m. UT.

Find out more about tomorrow's solar eclipse>>

With reporting by Andrew Fazekas


Source

понедельник, 3 января 2011 г.

New Species Photos: Fangless Snake, Bald Bird Near the Mekong River

This gallery is part of a specialNational Geographic Newsserieson global river and water conservation issues.

This split-nostril bat(Murina eleryi), spotted in a forest in northern Vietnam, was one of 145 new species of discovered in Southeast Asia's Greater Mekong region in 2009 and recently highlighted in a report by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

The Greater Mekong includes the portions of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, and China through which the Mekong, one of the world's great rivers, flows.

The new species reaffirm the region as one of Earth's major biological hot spots, scientists say.

“This rate of discovery is simply staggering in modern times,” said Stuart Chapman, Conservation Director of WWF Greater Mekong, in a statement.

“Each year, the new species count keeps going up, and with it, so too does the responsibility to ensure this region’s unique biodiversity is conserved."

(See more new Mekong species found in2009and2008.)

--Ker Than


Source